Sélectionner une page

The Lancaster House Agreement on Land refers to a historic agreement signed on 29th June 1979 between the British government, represented by then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) and Zimbabwe African People`s Union (ZAPU), represented by their leaders Robert Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo, respectively.

The agreement was a crucial turning point in Zimbabwe`s history as it paved the way for the country`s independence from British colonial rule, which was achieved on 18th April 1980. The agreement focused on the issue of land ownership and was essential in bringing an end to a protracted guerrilla war that had ravaged the country for years.

Under the agreement, the British government committed to providing financial and technical support to assist the Zimbabwean government in the acquisition of land from white farmers, who owned about 70% of the country`s productive land. The agreement stipulated that land would be acquired on a « willing buyer, willing seller » basis, with the British government providing £44 million to buy land.

However, the agreement did not live up to its promises. The British government failed to fulfill its pledge to provide financial support for the land reform program, which resulted in Zimbabwe`s government resorting to self-financing. Additionally, the « willing buyer, willing seller » policy proved to be ineffective, as white farmers inflated land prices and refused to sell, leading to slow progress in land reforms.

The Lancaster House Agreement on Land remains a controversial topic, with some viewing it as a historic breakthrough that paved the way for Zimbabwe`s independence, while others view it as a flawed agreement that failed to live up to its promises on land reform. The issue of land ownership remains a contentious issue in Zimbabwe`s politics, with many calling for a more equitable distribution of land.

In conclusion, the Lancaster House Agreement on Land was a pivotal moment in Zimbabwe`s history, as it paved the way for the country`s independence from British colonial rule. However, the agreement`s failure to deliver on its promises on land reform has continued to be a contentious issue in Zimbabwe`s politics, with many calling for a more equitable distribution of land.